Supreme Court Bars Landowners from Claiming More Compensation After Full Settlement Deal
New Delhi: A significant ruling from the Supreme Court of India has set a firm precedent, stating that landowners who voluntarily accept a full and final compensation deal for their acquired land cannot later seek additional payments like solatium or interest. This decision comes in a case concerning land acquisition under the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997.
Contractual Settlement Trumps Statutory Claims
A Bench of the apex court emphasized that once the parties voluntarily sign an agreement defining the compensation package as a complete and final settlement, all potential issues regarding rent, interest, or other additional payments become fully integrated into that contract.
The Court held that this contractual finality bars landowners from re-opening the settlement to make further claims under the relevant statute. The judgment clearly observes that settlements made under the 1997 Act are intended to be final and cannot be reopened or modified afterwards.
High Court Order Set Aside
The Supreme Court found that the High Court had erred in relying on Section 12 of the 1997 Act, which deals with interest payments after possession is taken. According to the apex court, the voluntary nature and terms of the compensation contract left no room for applying statutory remedies. The Court pointed to Sections 7(2) and 7(4) of the Act, which explicitly bar seeking additional benefits once a final agreement on compensation has been reached.
Allowing the appeal filed by the Tamil Nadu government, the Supreme Court effectively set aside the High Court’s previous order, reinforcing the binding nature of full and final compensation agreements in land acquisition matters.
Case: Government of Tamil Nadu vs. P.R. Jaganathan & Others
